AlphaRacks 1GB内存 洛杉矶QN KVM VPS测评

  • 内容
  • 评论
  • 相关

详情AlphaRacks:$15/年/1GB内存/20GB空间/4TB流量/KVM/洛杉矶QN
从测评看,性能不错,IO给力。建议带宽升级到1Gbps(年付2刀)。

1、系统信息、I/O 性能测试、路由测试

CPU model            : QEMU Virtual CPU version (cpu64-rhel6)
Number of cores      : 1
CPU frequency        : 2099.998 MHz
Total size of Disk   : 19.0 GB (0.8 GB Used)
Total amount of Mem  : 1002 MB (402 MB Used)
Total amount of Swap : 1023 MB (0 MB Used)
System uptime        : 0 days, 0 hour 9 min
Load average         : 0.44, 0.13, 0.05
OS                   : Debian GNU/Linux 7
Arch                 : x86_64 (64 Bit)
Kernel               : 3.2.0-4-amd64
ipaddr               : 美国 佛罗里达州 迈阿密  quadranet.com
vm                   : kvm
----------------------------------------------------------------------
===== 开始硬盘性能测试 =====
ioping: seek rate
    min/avg/max/mdev = 0.0/0.1/3.7/0.1 ms
ioping: sequential speed
    12700 requests completed in 5000.9 ms, 3482 iops, 870.6 mb/s
===== 硬盘性能测试完成 =====
----------------------------------------------------------------------
===== 开始speedtest =====
Retrieving speedtest.net configuration...
Testing from QuadraNet (23.226.136.168)...
Retrieving speedtest.net server list...
Selecting best server based on ping...
Hosted by AT&T (Jacksonville, FL) [1.48 km]: 89.719 ms
Testing download speed................................................................................
Download: 77.11 Mbit/s
Testing upload speed................................................................................................
Upload: 23.42 Mbit/s
Share results: http://www.speedtest.net/result/7545351610.png
===== speedtest完成 =====
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Node Name:                      IPv4 address:                  Download Speed
CacheFly:                       205.234.175.175:          25.27 MiB/s |  202.12 Mbps
Linode, Tokyo, JP:              106.187.96.148:            2.03 MiB/s |   16.21 Mbps
Linode, Tokyo2, JP:             139.162.65.37:             1.28 MiB/s |   10.23 Mbps
Linode, Singapore, SG:          139.162.23.4:              1.11 MiB/s |    8.88 Mbps
Linode, Fremont, CA:            50.116.14.9:               9.92 MiB/s |   79.36 Mbps
Linode, Newark, NJ:             50.116.57.237:             3.44 MiB/s |   27.49 Mbps
Linode, London, UK:             176.58.107.39:             1.00 MiB/s |    7.97 Mbps
Linode, Frankfurt, DE:          139.162.130.8:             2.66 MiB/s |   21.31 Mbps
Softlayer, Tokyo, JP:           161.202.125.20:            1.24 MiB/s |    9.92 Mbps
Softlayer, Singapore, SG:       119.81.28.170:             1.64 MiB/s |   13.13 Mbps
Softlayer, Seoul, KR:           119.81.28.170:           697.82 KiB/s |    5.45 Mbps
Softlayer, HongKong, CN:        119.81.130.170:            1.54 MiB/s |   12.32 Mbps
Softlayer, Dallas, TX:          169.48.124.82:             2.31 MiB/s |   18.46 Mbps
Softlayer, Seattle, WA:         67.228.112.250:            2.95 MiB/s |   23.64 Mbps
Softlayer, Frankfurt, DE:       159.122.69.4:              1.28 MiB/s |   10.23 Mbps
Softlayer, Paris, FR:           159.8.64.212:              2.88 MiB/s |   23.03 Mbps
Leaseweb, HongKong, CN:         43.249.36.49:              1.73 MiB/s |   13.81 Mbps
Leaseweb, Singapore, SG:        103.254.153.18:            2.03 MiB/s |   16.22 Mbps
Leaseweb, Washington D.C., US:  207.244.94.80:             4.69 MiB/s |   37.49 Mbps
Leaseweb, San Francisco, US:    209.58.135.187:           18.19 MiB/s |  145.54 Mbps
Leaseweb, Netherlands, NL:      5.79.108.33:               1.65 MiB/s |   13.19 Mbps
OVH, Montreal, CA:              192.99.19.165:             2.92 MiB/s |   23.37 Mbps
Hinet, Taiwan, TW:              210.61.132.1:              1.83 MiB/s |   14.64 Mbps
----------------------------------------------------------------------
节点名称:                   IP地址:                      下载速度
安徽合肥电信:             61.191.111.11:           854.91 KiB/s |    6.68 Mbps
江苏南京电信:             202.102.23.133:          367.83 KiB/s |    2.87 Mbps
四川成都电信:             182.140.131.250:         675.16 KiB/s |    5.27 Mbps
江西南昌电信:             182.98.238.226:          438.43 KiB/s |    3.43 Mbps
新疆昌吉电信:             61.128.107.242:          281.65 KiB/s |    2.20 Mbps
安徽合肥联通:             112.122.10.26:             1.67 MiB/s |   13.35 Mbps
山东济南联通:             221.214.108.58:          431.39 KiB/s |    3.37 Mbps
吉林长春联通:             221.9.246.35:            889.08 KiB/s |    6.95 Mbps
湖北武汉联通:             113.57.249.2:              1.23 MiB/s |    9.82 Mbps
西藏拉萨联通:             221.13.70.244:           558.67 KiB/s |    4.36 Mbps
辽宁沈阳联通:             175.167.135.234:           1.12 MiB/s |    9.00 Mbps
山西太原联通:             218.26.109.107:            1.89 MiB/s |   15.14 Mbps
江苏南京联通:             153.37.96.226:             1.35 MiB/s |   10.81 Mbps
安徽合肥移动:             120.209.140.60:            1.24 MiB/s |    9.95 Mbps
山西太原移动:             183.203.24.210:          688.17 KiB/s |    5.38 Mbps
四川成都移动:             183.221.247.9:           133.27 KiB/s |    1.04 Mbps
新疆昌吉移动:             117.190.59.82:            89.80 KiB/s |    0.70 Mbps
吉林长春移动:             111.26.139.78:           585.33 KiB/s |    4.57 Mbps
西藏拉萨移动:             211.139.74.234:          471.20 KiB/s |    3.68 Mbps
辽宁沈阳移动:             221.180.176.102:         864.86 KiB/s |    6.76 Mbps
湖北武汉移动:             111.48.26.136:           290.84 KiB/s |    2.27 Mbps
四川成都教育网:          202.115.1.138:           419.43 KiB/s |    3.28 Mbps
----------------------------------------------------------------------
===== 测试 [安徽合肥电信] 的回程路由 =====
linuxtest.sh: line 214: ./besttrace: No such file or directory
===== 回程 [安徽合肥电信] 路由测试结束 =====
===== 测试 [江苏南京电信] 的回程路由 =====
linuxtest.sh: line 214: ./besttrace: No such file or directory
===== 回程 [江苏南京电信] 路由测试结束 =====
===== 测试 [江西南昌电信] 的回程路由 =====
linuxtest.sh: line 214: ./besttrace: No such file or directory
===== 回程 [江西南昌电信] 路由测试结束 =====
===== 测试 [新疆昌吉电信] 的回程路由 =====
linuxtest.sh: line 214: ./besttrace: No such file or directory
===== 回程 [新疆昌吉电信] 路由测试结束 =====
===== 测试 [安徽合肥联通] 的回程路由 =====
linuxtest.sh: line 214: ./besttrace: No such file or directory
===== 回程 [安徽合肥联通] 路由测试结束 =====
===== 测试 [山东济南联通] 的回程路由 =====
linuxtest.sh: line 214: ./besttrace: No such file or directory
===== 回程 [山东济南联通] 路由测试结束 =====
===== 测试 [湖北武汉联通] 的回程路由 =====
linuxtest.sh: line 214: ./besttrace: No such file or directory
===== 回程 [湖北武汉联通] 路由测试结束 =====
===== 测试 [西藏拉萨联通] 的回程路由 =====
linuxtest.sh: line 214: ./besttrace: No such file or directory
===== 回程 [西藏拉萨联通] 路由测试结束 =====
===== 测试 [辽宁沈阳联通] 的回程路由 =====
linuxtest.sh: line 214: ./besttrace: No such file or directory
===== 回程 [辽宁沈阳联通] 路由测试结束 =====
===== 测试 [山西太原联通] 的回程路由 =====
linuxtest.sh: line 214: ./besttrace: No such file or directory
===== 回程 [山西太原联通] 路由测试结束 =====
===== 测试 [江苏南京联通] 的回程路由 =====
linuxtest.sh: line 214: ./besttrace: No such file or directory
===== 回程 [江苏南京联通] 路由测试结束 =====
===== 测试 [安徽合肥移动] 的回程路由 =====
linuxtest.sh: line 214: ./besttrace: No such file or directory
===== 回程 [安徽合肥移动] 路由测试结束 =====
===== 测试 [山西太原移动] 的回程路由 =====
linuxtest.sh: line 214: ./besttrace: No such file or directory
===== 回程 [山西太原移动] 路由测试结束 =====
===== 测试 [四川成都移动] 的回程路由 =====
linuxtest.sh: line 214: ./besttrace: No such file or directory
===== 回程 [四川成都移动] 路由测试结束 =====
===== 测试 [新疆昌吉移动] 的回程路由 =====
linuxtest.sh: line 214: ./besttrace: No such file or directory
===== 回程 [新疆昌吉移动] 路由测试结束 =====
===== 测试 [吉林长春移动] 的回程路由 =====
linuxtest.sh: line 214: ./besttrace: No such file or directory
===== 回程 [吉林长春移动] 路由测试结束 =====
===== 测试 [西藏拉萨移动] 的回程路由 =====
linuxtest.sh: line 214: ./besttrace: No such file or directory
===== 回程 [西藏拉萨移动] 路由测试结束 =====
===== 测试 [辽宁沈阳移动] 的回程路由 =====
linuxtest.sh: line 214: ./besttrace: No such file or directory
===== 回程 [辽宁沈阳移动] 路由测试结束 =====
===== 测试 [湖北武汉移动] 的回程路由 =====
linuxtest.sh: line 214: ./besttrace: No such file or directory
===== 回程 [湖北武汉移动] 路由测试结束 =====
===== 测试 [四川成都教育网] 的回程路由 =====
linuxtest.sh: line 214: ./besttrace: No such file or directory
===== 回程 [四川成都教育网] 路由测试结束 =====
----------------------------------------------------------------------
【安徽合肥电信】 - speedtest1.ah163.com
10 packets transmitted, 9 received, 10% packet loss, time 9010ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 235.566/247.909/252.973/7.125 ms
----------------------------------------------------------------------
【江苏南京电信】 - 4gnanjing1.speedtest.jsinfo.net
10 packets transmitted, 9 received, 10% packet loss, time 9002ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 219.027/258.483/278.631/22.321 ms
----------------------------------------------------------------------
【四川成都电信】 - speed.westidc.com.cn
10 packets transmitted, 10 received, 0% packet loss, time 9001ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 251.422/271.484/287.946/11.206 ms
----------------------------------------------------------------------
【江西南昌电信】 - swxwyzx.f3322.net
10 packets transmitted, 9 received, 10% packet loss, time 9011ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 241.415/266.439/277.185/12.079 ms
----------------------------------------------------------------------
【新疆昌吉电信】 - 61.128.107.242
10 packets transmitted, 10 received, 0% packet loss, time 9010ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 309.353/325.755/334.591/8.071 ms
----------------------------------------------------------------------
【安徽合肥联通】 - 112.122.10.26
10 packets transmitted, 9 received, 10% packet loss, time 9010ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 220.349/222.099/223.513/0.819 ms
----------------------------------------------------------------------
【山东济南联通】 - speedtest.jnltwy.com
10 packets transmitted, 10 received, 0% packet loss, time 9008ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 214.156/215.785/217.797/1.143 ms
----------------------------------------------------------------------
【湖北武汉联通】 - 113.57.249.2
10 packets transmitted, 9 received, 10% packet loss, time 9004ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 220.869/224.299/231.362/3.258 ms
----------------------------------------------------------------------
【西藏拉萨联通】 - 221.13.70.244
10 packets transmitted, 9 received, 10% packet loss, time 9010ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 265.693/273.554/275.859/3.013 ms
----------------------------------------------------------------------
【辽宁沈阳联通】 - speedtest1.online.ln.cn
10 packets transmitted, 10 received, 0% packet loss, time 9001ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 219.800/223.920/231.111/3.964 ms
----------------------------------------------------------------------
【山西太原联通】 - speedtest.sxunicomjzjk.cn
10 packets transmitted, 9 received, 10% packet loss, time 9011ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 204.615/211.867/219.562/4.326 ms
----------------------------------------------------------------------
【江苏南京联通】 - speedtest02.js165.com
10 packets transmitted, 10 received, 0% packet loss, time 23436ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 212.905/215.973/223.424/4.102 ms
----------------------------------------------------------------------
【安徽合肥移动】 - 4gtest.ahydnet.com
10 packets transmitted, 9 received, 10% packet loss, time 71968ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 261.892/281.542/290.586/10.428 ms
----------------------------------------------------------------------
【山西太原移动】 - sp.sx.chinamobile.com
10 packets transmitted, 6 received, 40% packet loss, time 20150ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 221.470/222.942/224.203/1.119 ms
----------------------------------------------------------------------
【四川成都移动】 - 183.221.247.9
10 packets transmitted, 7 received, 30% packet loss, time 9024ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 225.976/376.532/563.678/112.415 ms
----------------------------------------------------------------------
【新疆昌吉移动】 - speedtest5.xj.chinamobile.com
10 packets transmitted, 10 received, 0% packet loss, time 9002ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 265.014/280.376/294.971/9.956 ms
----------------------------------------------------------------------
【吉林长春移动】 - speedtest2.jl.chinamobile.com
10 packets transmitted, 10 received, 0% packet loss, time 9011ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 283.772/287.074/288.557/1.344 ms
----------------------------------------------------------------------
【西藏拉萨移动】 - speedtest1.xz.chinamobile.com
10 packets transmitted, 10 received, 0% packet loss, time 9002ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 321.823/327.543/329.766/2.339 ms
----------------------------------------------------------------------
【辽宁沈阳移动】 - speedtest1.ln.chinamobile.com
10 packets transmitted, 9 received, 10% packet loss, time 27973ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 224.283/224.761/226.833/0.848 ms
----------------------------------------------------------------------
【湖北武汉移动】 - speedtest1.hb.chinamobile.com
10 packets transmitted, 10 received, 0% packet loss, time 9541ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 282.628/286.966/288.518/1.704 ms
----------------------------------------------------------------------
【四川成都教育网】 - sp1.uestc.edu.cn
10 packets transmitted, 10 received, 0% packet loss, time 8999ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 248.377/263.880/276.755/9.001 ms
----------------------------------------------------------------------
min:最低延迟
avg:平均延迟
max:最高延迟
mdev:平均偏差

2、国内访问速度
AlphaRacks-HDD-LA-ping.jpg

3、UnixBench跑分

Benchmark Run: Sun Aug 12 2018 00:06:45 - 00:34:51
1 CPU in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests
Dhrystone 2 using register variables       25359391.2 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone                     3695.9 MWIPS (9.8 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput                               3512.3 lps   (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks        947143.9 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks          289916.7 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks       1741822.3 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput                             2102163.6 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching                 357740.7 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation                              10000.3 lps   (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                   6068.9 lpm   (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                    779.0 lpm   (60.0 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead                        3437460.8 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
System Benchmarks Index Values               BASELINE       RESULT    INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables         116700.0   25359391.2   2173.0
Double-Precision Whetstone                       55.0       3695.9    672.0
Execl Throughput                                 43.0       3512.3    816.8
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks          3960.0     947143.9   2391.8
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks            1655.0     289916.7   1751.8
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks          5800.0    1741822.3   3003.1
Pipe Throughput                               12440.0    2102163.6   1689.8
Pipe-based Context Switching                   4000.0     357740.7    894.4
Process Creation                                126.0      10000.3    793.7
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                     42.4       6068.9   1431.4
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                      6.0        779.0   1298.4
System Call Overhead                          15000.0    3437460.8   2291.6
                                                                   ========
System Benchmarks Index Score                                        1435.7

4、Youtube速度测试
AlphaRacks-youtube.jpg

评论

0条评论
  1. Gravatar 头像

    brook 回复

    呵呵,搞不清楚为啥推这家,多烂的机器了

    • Gravatar 头像

      admin 回复

      @brook KVM这样的配置和价格,我觉得不错。
      另外,我自己花钱、花时间做的测评,是供需要购买者参考的。和推荐有啥关系?

发表评论

电子邮件地址不会被公开。 必填项已用*标注