Tospeed 512MB内存 SSD硬盘 新西伯利亚 KVM VPS测评

  • 内容
  • 评论
  • 相关

详情:Tospeed:20元/月/512MB内存/10GB SSD空间/3TB流量/KVM/新西伯利亚
SSD硬盘的KVM VPS,网络、性能、I/O都很不错,如果能长期、稳定运营,值得入手。

1、系统信息、带宽测试

CPU model            : QEMU Virtual CPU version (cpu64-rhel6)
Number of cores      : 1
CPU frequency        : 4200.028 MHz
Total size of Disk   : 9.4 GB (1.2 GB Used)
Total amount of Mem  : 490 MB (337 MB Used)
Total amount of Swap : 511 MB (0 MB Used)
System uptime        : 0 days, 13 hour 53 min
Load average         : 0.54, 0.16, 0.05
OS                   : CentOS 6.9
Arch                 : x86_64 (64 Bit)
Kernel               : 2.6.32-696.23.1.el6.x86_64
ip                   : 185.135.xxx.xxx
ipaddr               : 俄罗斯 新西伯利亚州 新西伯利亚  adman.com
vm                   : kvm
Node Name:                      IPv4 address:                  Download Speed
CacheFly:                       205.234.175.175:          12.71 MiB/s |  101.68 Mbps
Linode, Tokyo, JP:              106.187.96.148:           11.64 MiB/s |   93.13 Mbps
Linode, Tokyo2, JP:             139.162.65.37:             2.68 MiB/s |   21.43 Mbps
Linode, Singapore, SG:          139.162.23.4:              2.13 MiB/s |   17.01 Mbps
Linode, Fremont, CA:            50.116.14.9:             709.42 KiB/s |    5.54 Mbps
Linode, Newark, NJ:             50.116.57.237:             5.57 MiB/s |   44.54 Mbps
Linode, London, UK:             176.58.107.39:            10.88 MiB/s |   87.03 Mbps
Linode, Frankfurt, DE:          139.162.130.8:            11.39 MiB/s |   91.15 Mbps
Softlayer, Tokyo, JP:           161.202.125.20:            1.53 MiB/s |   12.21 Mbps
Softlayer, Singapore, SG:       119.81.28.170:             2.96 MiB/s |   23.69 Mbps
Softlayer, Seoul, KR:           119.81.28.170:             2.87 MiB/s |   22.93 Mbps
Softlayer, HongKong, CN:        119.81.130.170:            4.00 MiB/s |   31.99 Mbps
Softlayer, Dallas, TX:          169.48.124.82:             2.20 MiB/s |   17.57 Mbps
Softlayer, Seattle, WA:         67.228.112.250:            2.20 MiB/s |   17.58 Mbps
Softlayer, Frankfurt, DE:       159.122.69.4:              9.64 MiB/s |   77.10 Mbps
Softlayer, Paris, FR:           159.8.64.212:              8.78 MiB/s |   70.22 Mbps
Leaseweb, HongKong, CN:         43.249.36.49:              3.48 MiB/s |   27.87 Mbps
Leaseweb, Singapore, SG:        103.254.153.18:            5.93 MiB/s |   47.42 Mbps
Leaseweb, Washington D.C., US:  207.244.94.80:             5.54 MiB/s |   44.29 Mbps
Leaseweb, San Francisco, US:    209.58.135.187:            2.22 MiB/s |   17.78 Mbps
Leaseweb, Netherlands, NL:      5.79.108.33:               6.40 MiB/s |   51.16 Mbps
OVH, Montreal, CA:              192.99.19.165:             3.27 MiB/s |   26.13 Mbps
ChinaTelecom, Shanghai, CN:     101.95.48.41:            830.66 KiB/s |    6.49 Mbps
ChinaTelecom, Beijing, CN:      60.247.96.2:               1.08 MiB/s |    8.62 Mbps
ChinaUnicom, Beijing, CN:       61.135.202.2:              5.43 MiB/s |   43.46 Mbps
ChinaTelecom, Guangzhou, CN:    119.145.88.166:            4.21 MiB/s |   33.68 Mbps
ChinaMobile, Guangzhou, CN:     221.179.46.222:          204.45 KiB/s |    1.60 Mbps
ChinaTelecom, Hefei, CN:        61.191.111.11:             7.41 MiB/s |   59.30 Mbps
ChinaUnicom, Hefei, CN:         112.122.10.26:             8.67 MiB/s |   69.35 Mbps
ChinaMobile, Hefei, CN:         120.209.140.60:            2.30 MiB/s |   18.42 Mbps
Hinet, Taiwan, TW:              210.61.132.1:              4.26 MiB/s |   34.09 Mbps

2、上传/下载带宽测试

Retrieving speedtest.net server list...
Selecting best server based on ping...
Hosted by Akado Telecom (Moscow) [0.15 km]: 81.515 ms
Testing download speed..........................................
Download: 242.40 Mbit/s
Testing upload speed............................................
Upload: 173.45 Mbit/s

3、国内访问速度
Tospeed-ping.jpg

4、硬盘 I/O 性能测试

ioping: seek rate
    min/avg/max/mdev = 22.5 us / 51.6 us / 14.0 ms / 175.3 us
ioping: sequential speed
    generated 12.0 k requests in 5.00 s, 2.92 GiB, 2.39 k iops, 598.3 MiB/s

5、UnixBench跑分

Benchmark Run: Tue May 15 2018 11:36:57 - 12:05:21
1 CPU in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests
Dhrystone 2 using register variables       48080249.7 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone                     4095.9 MWIPS (11.8 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput                               4606.9 lps   (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks        428998.3 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks          117549.4 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks       1296243.0 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput                              656128.9 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching                 175828.0 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation                              14132.0 lps   (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                   5584.0 lpm   (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                    755.4 lpm   (60.0 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead                         649009.0 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
System Benchmarks Index Values               BASELINE       RESULT    INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables         116700.0   48080249.7   4120.0
Double-Precision Whetstone                       55.0       4095.9    744.7
Execl Throughput                                 43.0       4606.9   1071.4
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks          3960.0     428998.3   1083.3
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks            1655.0     117549.4    710.3
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks          5800.0    1296243.0   2234.9
Pipe Throughput                               12440.0     656128.9    527.4
Pipe-based Context Switching                   4000.0     175828.0    439.6
Process Creation                                126.0      14132.0   1121.6
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                     42.4       5584.0   1317.0
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                      6.0        755.4   1259.0
System Call Overhead                          15000.0     649009.0    432.7
                                                                   ========
System Benchmarks Index Score                                        1004.4

6、丢包测试

Ping from 192.168.16.243 to 185.135.xxx.xxx
==============================================================================
05/15 11:38:47.541         Ping to 185.135.xxx.xxx with 32 bytes of data and 32 of TTL:
05/15 11:38:47.669 PingMin #1 Reply 32 bytes from 185.135.xxx.xxx: time=121ms TTL=52, ave=121.00ms
05/15 11:38:48.667 PingMin #2 Reply 32 bytes from 185.135.xxx.xxx: time=119ms TTL=52, ave=120.00ms
05/15 11:39:01.671 PingMax #15 Reply 32 bytes from 185.135.xxx.xxx: time=124ms TTL=52, ave=119.60ms
05/15 11:39:08.663 PingMin #22 Reply 32 bytes from 185.135.xxx.xxx: time=118ms TTL=52, ave=119.55ms
05/15 11:39:09.672 PingMax #23 Reply 32 bytes from 185.135.xxx.xxx: time=130ms TTL=52, ave=120.00ms
05/15 11:40:06.681 PingMax #80 Reply 32 bytes from 185.135.xxx.xxx: time=137ms TTL=52, ave=119.96ms
05/15 11:40:25.683 PingMax #99 Reply 32 bytes from 185.135.xxx.xxx: time=138ms TTL=52, ave=120.06ms
05/15 11:40:26.674         === 100 有效发送,   100 接收,     0.00% 丢失, 120.06ms 平均值  ===
--- 结果 & 统计信息 ------------------------------------------------------
开始时间:  2018/05/15 11:38:47
经过时间:            000:01:39
结束时间:  2018/05/15 11:40:26
----------------
    100 总计发送
    0 无效接收 (除了超时的其它错误)
----------------
    100 有效发送
    100 有效接收
    0 timed out (0.00% 丢失)
Ping 最小值  118ms, 最大值  138ms, 平均值  120.06ms

7、路由追踪
电信
Tospeedtrac-dx

联通
Tospeedtrac-lt

移动
Tospeedtrac-yd

8、Youtube速度测试
Tospeed-youtube.jpg

评论

0条评论
  1. Gravatar 头像

    千影 回复

    大佬这么快就用我的测试脚本啦

发表评论

电子邮件地址不会被公开。 必填项已用*标注