Tospeed 512MB内存 100GB空间 新西伯利亚 KVM VPS测评

  • 内容
  • 评论
  • 相关

详情:Tospeed:24元/月/512MB内存/150GB空间/4TB流量/KVM/新西伯利亚
网络很不错,性价比高,I/O是硬伤,毕竟单盘。

1、系统信息、带宽、I/O测试

CPU model            : QEMU Virtual CPU version (cpu64-rhel6)
Number of cores      : 1
CPU frequency        : 4199.996 MHz
Total size of Disk   : 98.0 GB (1.0 GB Used)
Total amount of Mem  : 490 MB (225 MB Used)
Total amount of Swap : 511 MB (0 MB Used)
System uptime        : 0 days 0 hour 7 min
Load average         : 0.34, 0.62, 0.35
OS                   : CentOS 6.9
Arch                 : x86_64 (64 Bit)
Kernel               : 2.6.32-696.23.1.el6.x86_64
Virt                 : kvm
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I/O speed( 32M )     : 15.8 MB/s
I/O speed( 256M )    : 8.7 MB/s
I/O speed( 2G )      : 9.4 MB/s
Average I/O speed    : 11.3 MB/s
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Node Name         Upload Speed      Download Speed      Latency
Normal Node       7.34 Mbit/s       40.90 Mbit/s        217.766 ms
Xiangyang CT      57.45 Mbit/s      176.66 Mbit/s       381.196 ms
Xi'an     CU      43.25 Mbit/s      179.10 Mbit/s       299.329 ms
Shanghai  CU      66.37 Mbit/s      251.23 Mbit/s       122.072 ms
Chongqing CU      66.67 Mbit/s      81.91 Mbit/s        465.397 ms
Xi'an     CM      5.80 Mbit/s       19.83 Mbit/s        445.232 ms
Shanghai  CM      3.66 Mbit/s       1.24 Mbit/s         381.742 ms
Chengdu   CM      5.33 Mbit/s       1.08 Mbit/s         657.768 ms
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Total time   : 11 min 15 sec
Current time : 2018-04-30 22:33:17
Finished!

2018年5月1日更新:

CPU model            : QEMU Virtual CPU version (cpu64-rhel6)
Number of cores      : 1
CPU frequency        : 4199.996 MHz
Total size of Disk   : 98.0 GB (1.3 GB Used)
Total amount of Mem  : 485 MB (413 MB Used)
Total amount of Swap : 511 MB (0 MB Used)
System uptime        : 0 days, 7 hour 46 min
Load average         : 0.00, 0.00, 0.00
OS                   : CentOS 6.9
Arch                 : x86_64 (64 Bit)
Kernel               : 4.9.75-30.el6.x86_64
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I/O speed(1st run)   : 45.1 MB/s
I/O speed(2nd run)   : 61.6 MB/s
I/O speed(3rd run)   : 62.3 MB/s
Average I/O speed    : 56.3 MB/s
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Node Name                       IPv4 address            Download Speed
CacheFly                        205.234.175.175         11.4MB/s
Linode, Tokyo, JP               106.187.96.148          12.6MB/s
Linode, Singapore, SG           139.162.23.4            4.82MB/s
Linode, London, UK              176.58.107.39           12.2MB/s
Linode, Frankfurt, DE           139.162.130.8           12.5MB/s
Linode, Fremont, CA             50.116.14.9             1.60MB/s
Softlayer, Dallas, TX           173.192.68.18           5.78MB/s
Softlayer, Seattle, WA          67.228.112.250          4.77MB/s
Softlayer, Frankfurt, DE        159.122.69.4            8.46MB/s
Softlayer, Singapore, SG        119.81.28.170           2.99MB/s
Softlayer, HongKong, CN         119.81.130.170          8.78MB/s

2、上传/下载带宽测试

Selecting best server based on ping...
Hosted by Beijing Telecom (Beijing) [1.69 km]: 220.989 ms
Testing download speed..................
Download: 69.73 Mbit/s
Testing upload speed....................
Upload: 66.72 Mbit/s

3、国内访问速度
Tospeed-ping.png

4、硬盘 I/O 性能测试

dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=64k count=4k oflag=dsync
^C1578+0 records in
1578+0 records out
103415808 bytes (103 MB) copied, 1015.48 s, 102 kB/s

2018年5月1日更新:

dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=64k count=4k oflag=dsync
4096+0 records in
4096+0 records out
268435456 bytes (268 MB) copied, 349.582 s, 768 kB/s

5、UnixBench跑分

Benchmark Run: Mon Apr 30 2018 22:58:25 - 23:28:22
1 CPU in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests
Dhrystone 2 using register variables       51681130.1 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone                     3303.3 MWIPS (15.7 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput                               5922.5 lps   (29.6 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks        625688.9 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks          170101.4 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks       1875298.8 KBps  (30.1 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput                             1103756.7 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching                 326876.4 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation                              20538.0 lps   (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                   7739.0 lpm   (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                   1029.4 lpm   (60.1 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead                         878934.4 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
System Benchmarks Index Values               BASELINE       RESULT    INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables         116700.0   51681130.1   4428.5
Double-Precision Whetstone                       55.0       3303.3    600.6
Execl Throughput                                 43.0       5922.5   1377.3
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks          3960.0     625688.9   1580.0
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks            1655.0     170101.4   1027.8
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks          5800.0    1875298.8   3233.3
Pipe Throughput                               12440.0    1103756.7    887.3
Pipe-based Context Switching                   4000.0     326876.4    817.2
Process Creation                                126.0      20538.0   1630.0
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                     42.4       7739.0   1825.2
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                      6.0       1029.4   1715.7
System Call Overhead                          15000.0     878934.4    586.0
                                                                   ========
System Benchmarks Index Score                                        1364.7

6、丢包测试

Ping from 10.0.0.16 to 185.173.xxx.xxx
==============================================================================
04/30 22:50:13.073         Ping to 185.173.xxx.xxx with 32 bytes of data and 32 of TTL:
04/30 22:50:13.208 PingMin #1 Reply 32 bytes from 185.173.xxx.xxx: time=128ms TTL=54, ave=128.00ms
04/30 22:50:15.195 PingMin #3 Reply 32 bytes from 185.173.xxx.xxx: time=127ms TTL=54, ave=127.67ms
04/30 22:50:20.200 PingMax #8 Reply 32 bytes from 185.173.xxx.xxx: time=130ms TTL=54, ave=127.88ms
04/30 22:50:22.199 PingMin #10 Reply 32 bytes from 185.173.xxx.xxx: time=126ms TTL=54, ave=127.60ms
04/30 22:50:40.208 PingMax #28 Reply 32 bytes from 185.173.xxx.xxx: time=135ms TTL=54, ave=127.64ms
04/30 22:50:45.205 PingMax #33 Reply 32 bytes from 185.173.xxx.xxx: time=137ms TTL=54, ave=128.00ms
04/30 22:51:38.224 PingMax #86 Reply 32 bytes from 185.173.xxx.xxx: time=147ms TTL=54, ave=128.09ms
04/30 22:51:52.196         === 100 有效发送,   100 接收,     0.00% 丢失, 127.99ms 平均值  ===
--- 结果 & 统计信息 ------------------------------------------------------
开始时间:  2018/04/30 22:50:13
经过时间:            000:01:39
结束时间:  2018/04/30 22:51:52
----------------
    100 总计发送
    0 无效接收 (除了超时的其它错误)
----------------
    100 有效发送
    100 有效接收
    0 timed out (0.00% 丢失)
Ping 最小值  126ms, 最大值  147ms, 平均值  127.99ms

7、路由追踪
电信
Tospeed-tarc-dx.png

联通
Tospeed-trac-lt.png

移动
Tospeed-trac-yd.png

8、Youtube速度测试
Tospeed-youtube.jpg

评论

0条评论
  1. Gravatar 头像

    rcdfrd 回复

    昨天晚上测的人太多了
    现在io好多了

    • Gravatar 头像

      bpdama 回复

      @rcdfrd 内存512现在略显不足了,1gb的便宜vps都普及了。

发表评论

电子邮件地址不会被公开。 必填项已用*标注