详情：WootHosting：$18/年/1GB内存/30GB空间/3TB流量/KVM/芝加哥/纽约/洛杉矶
从测评看，芝加哥不管是网络还是性能，综合看，是最好的！
1、系统信息、带宽、I/O测试
CPU model : QEMU Virtual CPU version (cpu64-rhel6)
Number of cores : 2
CPU frequency : 2399.998 MHz
Total size of Disk : 48.0 GB (1.1 GB Used)
Total amount of Mem : 1893 MB (963 MB Used)
Total amount of Swap : 2047 MB (0 MB Used)
System uptime : 0 days 2 hour 10 min
Load average : 0.00, 0.56, 1.69
OS : CentOS 6.9
Arch : i686 (32 Bit)
Kernel : 2.6.32-431.1.2.0.1.el6.i686
Virt : kvm
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I/O speed( 32M ) : 188 MB/s
I/O speed( 256M ) : 129 MB/s
I/O speed( 2G ) : 114 MB/s
Average I/O speed : 143.7 MB/s
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Node Name Upload Speed Download Speed Latency
Normal Node 91.14 Mbit/s 96.99 Mbit/s 7.279 ms
Xiangyang CT 16.37 Mbit/s 23.67 Mbit/s 552.282 ms
Chengdu CT 11.01 Mbit/s 31.86 Mbit/s 225.871 ms
Xi'an CU 10.40 Mbit/s 23.33 Mbit/s 310.033 ms
Shanghai CU 8.64 Mbit/s 29.57 Mbit/s 186.152 ms
Chongqing CU 11.59 Mbit/s 22.65 Mbit/s 295.96 ms
Xi'an CM 33.20 Mbit/s 34.62 Mbit/s 222.813 ms
Shanghai CM 12.50 Mbit/s 10.38 Mbit/s 244.821 ms
Chengdu CM 14.13 Mbit/s 4.46 Mbit/s 214.583 ms
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Total time : 4 min 19 sec
Current time : 2018-04-25 08:06:25
Finished！
2、上传/下载带宽测试
Retrieving speedtest.net server list...
Selecting best server based on ping...
Hosted by Atlantic Metro (Los Angeles, CA) [1.30 km]: 2.655 ms
Testing download speed................................................................................
Download: 87.01 Mbit/s
Testing upload speed................................................................................................
Upload: 78.62 Mbit/s
3、国内访问速度
4、硬盘 I/O 性能测试
dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=64k count=4k oflag=dsync
4096+0 records in
4096+0 records out
268435456 bytes (268 MB) copied, 12.1633 s, 22.1 MB/s
5、UnixBench跑分
Benchmark Run: Wed Apr 25 2018 06:53:12 - 07:21:09
2 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 10518541.4 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 2257.1 MWIPS (10.3 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 541.5 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 127384.6 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 32356.3 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 389937.7 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 207973.8 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 58187.2 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 1020.8 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 1691.1 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 404.7 lpm (60.1 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 1373162.6 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 10518541.4 901.3
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 2257.1 410.4
Execl Throughput 43.0 541.5 125.9
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 127384.6 321.7
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 32356.3 195.5
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 389937.7 672.3
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 207973.8 167.2
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 58187.2 145.5
Process Creation 126.0 1020.8 81.0
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 1691.1 398.8
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 404.7 674.5
System Call Overhead 15000.0 1373162.6 915.4
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 315.0
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benchmark Run: Wed Apr 25 2018 07:21:09 - 07:49:23
2 CPUs in system; running 2 parallel copies of tests
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 18523371.4 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 4236.8 MWIPS (9.9 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 2125.4 lps (29.9 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 183407.9 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 47587.1 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 630940.5 KBps (31.3 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 353052.6 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 108782.5 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 6157.1 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 3336.0 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 478.8 lpm (60.2 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 2010680.5 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 18523371.4 1587.3
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 4236.8 770.3
Execl Throughput 43.0 2125.4 494.3
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 183407.9 463.2
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 47587.1 287.5
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 630940.5 1087.8
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 353052.6 283.8
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 108782.5 272.0
Process Creation 126.0 6157.1 488.7
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 3336.0 786.8
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 478.8 798.0
System Call Overhead 15000.0 2010680.5 1340.5
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 612.3
6、丢包测试
Ping from 192.168.0.29 to 107.150.xxx.xxx
==============================================================================
04/25 20:34:56.906 Ping to 107.150.xxx.xxx with 32 bytes of data and 32 of TTL:
04/25 20:34:57.152 PingMin #1 Reply 32 bytes from 107.150.xxx.xxx: time=244ms TTL=52, ave=244.00ms
04/25 20:34:58.181 PingMax #2 Reply 32 bytes from 107.150.xxx.xxx: time=279ms TTL=52, ave=261.50ms
04/25 20:34:59.151 PingMin #3 Reply 32 bytes from 107.150.xxx.xxx: time=242ms TTL=52, ave=255.00ms
04/25 20:35:00.141 PingMin #4 Reply 32 bytes from 107.150.xxx.xxx: time=238ms TTL=52, ave=250.75ms
04/25 20:35:01.187 PingMax #5 Reply 32 bytes from 107.150.xxx.xxx: time=284ms TTL=52, ave=257.40ms
04/25 20:35:02.139 PingMin #6 Reply 32 bytes from 107.150.xxx.xxx: time=233ms TTL=52, ave=253.33ms
04/25 20:35:04.418 PingMax #8 Reply 32 bytes from 107.150.xxx.xxx: time=514ms TTL=52, ave=283.63ms
04/25 20:35:06.462 超时 #10 *****(32 bytes) 请求超时。
04/25 20:35:26.461 超时 #30 *****(32 bytes) 请求超时。
04/25 20:35:40.461 超时 #44 *****(32 bytes) 请求超时。
04/25 20:35:46.116 PingMin #50 Reply 32 bytes from 107.150.xxx.xxx: time=214ms TTL=52, ave=266.23ms
04/25 20:35:47.096 PingMin #51 Reply 32 bytes from 107.150.xxx.xxx: time=194ms TTL=52, ave=264.73ms
04/25 20:35:51.093 PingMin #55 Reply 32 bytes from 107.150.xxx.xxx: time=191ms TTL=52, ave=260.13ms
04/25 20:35:52.091 PingMin #56 Reply 32 bytes from 107.150.xxx.xxx: time=189ms TTL=52, ave=258.79ms
04/25 20:35:53.087 PingMin #57 Reply 32 bytes from 107.150.xxx.xxx: time=186ms TTL=52, ave=257.44ms
04/25 20:35:56.462 超时 #60 *****(32 bytes) 请求超时。
04/25 20:35:59.088 PingMin #63 Reply 32 bytes from 107.150.xxx.xxx: time=185ms TTL=52, ave=255.25ms
04/25 20:36:23.085 PingMin #87 Reply 32 bytes from 107.150.xxx.xxx: time=184ms TTL=52, ave=241.72ms
04/25 20:36:36.096 === 100 有效发送, 96 接收, 4.00% 丢失, 236.48ms 平均值 ===
--- 结果 & 统计信息 ------------------------------------------------------
开始时间: 2018/04/25 20:34:56
经过时间: 000:01:39
结束时间: 2018/04/25 20:36:36
----------------
100 总计发送
0 无效接收 (除了超时的其它错误)
----------------
100 有效发送
96 有效接收
4 timed out (4.00% 丢失)
Ping 最小值 184ms, 最大值 514ms, 平均值 236.48ms
7、路由追踪
电信
联通
8、Youtube速度测试
-
所有主机信息仅是为及时分享并收录，不做推荐！