TragicServers 1GB内存 KVM VPS 洛杉矶 简单测评

TragicServers,小而优的主机商,KVM VPS其实不错,OpenVZ的超售较多,不建议购买。
详情:TragicServers:$2.99/月/1GB内存/20GB SSD空间/1TB流量/KVM/洛杉矶
节点:Node kvm-e5la2

系统信息及带宽测试

System Info
-----------
Processor    : QEMU Virtual CPU version (cpu64-rhel6)
CPU Cores    : 2
Frequency    : 2400.084 MHz
Memory        : 996 MB
Swap        : 127 MB
Uptime        : 18 min,
OS        : CentOS release 6.8 (Final)
Arch        : x86_64 (64 Bit)
Kernel        : 2.6.32-504.23.4.el6.x86_64
Hostname    : localhost.localdomain
Speedtest (IPv4 only)
---------------------
Your public IPv4 is 107.161.xxx.xxx
Location        Provider    Speed
CDN            Cachefly    28.7MB/s
Atlanta, GA, US        Coloat        1.95MB/s
Dallas, TX, US        Softlayer    4.41MB/s
Seattle, WA, US        Softlayer    5.42MB/s
San Jose, CA, US    Softlayer    10.7MB/s
Washington, DC, US    Softlayer     3.87MB/s
Tokyo, Japan        Linode        2.27MB/s
Singapore         Softlayer    2.18MB/s
Rotterdam, Netherlands    id3.net        1.60MB/s
Haarlem, Netherlands    Leaseweb    6.10MB/s
Disk Speed
----------
I/O (1st run)    : 221 MB/s
I/O (2nd run)    : 231 MB/s
I/O (3rd run)    : 240 MB/s
Average I/O    : 230.667 MB/s

硬盘 I/O 性能

hdparm -t /dev/vda1
/dev/vda1:
Timing buffered disk reads: 716 MB in  3.01 seconds = 238.13 MB/sec

UnixBench跑分

Benchmark Run: Wed Nov 30 2016 04:25:25 - 04:53:38
2 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests
Dhrystone 2 using register variables       22885347.5 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone                     2869.3 MWIPS (9.9 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput                               1438.3 lps   (29.9 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks        414113.5 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks          116705.0 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks       1015928.5 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput                             1004428.3 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching                 170219.4 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation                               3345.0 lps   (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                   3073.0 lpm   (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                    706.3 lpm   (60.1 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead                        1553467.2 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
System Benchmarks Index Values               BASELINE       RESULT    INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables         116700.0   22885347.5   1961.0
Double-Precision Whetstone                       55.0       2869.3    521.7
Execl Throughput                                 43.0       1438.3    334.5
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks          3960.0     414113.5   1045.7
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks            1655.0     116705.0    705.2
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks          5800.0    1015928.5   1751.6
Pipe Throughput                               12440.0    1004428.3    807.4
Pipe-based Context Switching                   4000.0     170219.4    425.5
Process Creation                                126.0       3345.0    265.5
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                     42.4       3073.0    724.8
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                      6.0        706.3   1177.2
System Call Overhead                          15000.0    1553467.2   1035.6
                                                                   ========
System Benchmarks Index Score                                         757.4
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benchmark Run: Wed Nov 30 2016 04:53:38 - 05:21:49
2 CPUs in system; running 2 parallel copies of tests
Dhrystone 2 using register variables       43515822.3 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone                     5737.8 MWIPS (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput                               4308.1 lps   (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks        551586.6 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks          166746.1 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks       1537485.6 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput                             1990248.7 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching                 331458.6 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation                              11676.2 lps   (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                   6191.1 lpm   (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                    820.5 lpm   (60.1 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead                        2660421.7 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
System Benchmarks Index Values               BASELINE       RESULT    INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables         116700.0   43515822.3   3728.9
Double-Precision Whetstone                       55.0       5737.8   1043.2
Execl Throughput                                 43.0       4308.1   1001.9
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks          3960.0     551586.6   1392.9
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks            1655.0     166746.1   1007.5
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks          5800.0    1537485.6   2650.8
Pipe Throughput                               12440.0    1990248.7   1599.9
Pipe-based Context Switching                   4000.0     331458.6    828.6
Process Creation                                126.0      11676.2    926.7
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                     42.4       6191.1   1460.2
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                      6.0        820.5   1367.5
System Call Overhead                          15000.0    2660421.7   1773.6
                                                                   ========
System Benchmarks Index Score                                        1412.5

国内ping
TragicServers.png

路由追踪
TragicServers2.png

丢包测试

Ping from 192.168.1.102 to 107.161.xxx.xxx
==============================================================================
11/30 17:20:10.841         Ping to 107.161.xxx.xxx with 32 bytes of data and 32 of TTL:
11/30 17:20:11.067 PingMin #1 Reply 32 bytes from 107.161.xxx.xxx: time=222ms TTL=51, ave=222.00ms
11/30 17:20:16.072 PingMax #6 Reply 32 bytes from 107.161.xxx.xxx: time=223ms TTL=51, ave=222.17ms
11/30 17:20:21.066 PingMin #11 Reply 32 bytes from 107.161.xxx.xxx: time=221ms TTL=51, ave=222.00ms
11/30 17:20:24.065 PingMax #14 Reply 32 bytes from 107.161.xxx.xxx: time=224ms TTL=51, ave=222.07ms
11/30 17:20:26.069 PingMax #16 Reply 32 bytes from 107.161.xxx.xxx: time=225ms TTL=51, ave=222.25ms
11/30 17:20:28.078 PingMax #18 Reply 32 bytes from 107.161.xxx.xxx: time=229ms TTL=51, ave=222.61ms
11/30 17:20:30.072         === 20 有效发送,   20 接收,     0.00% 丢失, 222.50ms 平均值  ===
--- 结果 & 统计信息 ------------------------------------------------------
开始时间:  2016/11/30 17:20:10
经过时间:            000:00:19
结束时间:  2016/11/30 17:20:30
----------------
    20 总计发送
    0 无效接收 (除了超时的其它错误)
----------------
    20 有效发送
    20 有效接收
    0 timed out (0.00% 丢失)
Ping 最小值  221ms, 最大值  229ms, 平均值  222.50ms
    所有主机信息仅是为及时分享并收录,不做推荐!
    专门搜集、分享国内高速、稳定的香港、日本、韩国、新加坡、美西CN2等优质线路的主机:FastVM