详情：ChangeIP：$1.6/月/512MB内存/20GB SSD空间/500GB流量/KVM/洛杉矶Sharktech
TG群里有人说早上速度只有1M，所以撸了1个年付，测试下。从测评数据看，性能不错，网络也很好，100M没问题，轻松可以看4k，特别是联通，出奇的好。而且客服反映速度不错，早上买的，IP是墙的，发了TK，不到1小时就换了，不错（感觉换了客服）。这样的价格，达到这样的网络和服务，超值！
欢迎到TeleGram群讨论（一般需要梯子）：https://t.me/zhujiwiki
1、系统信息、带宽、I/O测试
CPU model : QEMU Virtual CPU version (cpu64-rhel6)
Number of cores : 1
CPU frequency : 2933.436 MHz
Total size of Disk : 20.0 GB (0.9 GB Used)
Total amount of Mem : 502 MB (98 MB Used)
Total amount of Swap : 511 MB (0 MB Used)
System uptime : 0 days 1 hour 19 min
Load average : 0.28, 0.38, 0.33
OS : Debian GNU/Linux 7
Arch : i686 (32 Bit)
Kernel : 3.2.0-4-686-pae
Virt : kvm
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I/O speed( 32M ) : 414 MB/s
I/O speed( 256M ) : 307 MB/s
I/O speed( 2G ) : 299 MB/s
Average I/O speed : 340.0 MB/s
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Node Name Upload Speed Download Speed Latency
Normal Node 165.54 Mbit/s 133.17 Mbit/s 24.521 ms
Xiangyang CT 85.25 Mbit/s 19.64 Mbit/s 336.894 ms
Shanghai CT 56.77 Mbit/s 34.38 Mbit/s 423.321 ms
Chengdu CT 0.18 Mbit/s 0.00 Mbit/s 000.000 ms
Xi'an CU 20.68 Mbit/s 19.67 Mbit/s 281.853 ms
Shanghai CU 74.61 Mbit/s 16.15 Mbit/s 180.957 ms
Chongqing CU 62.05 Mbit/s 35.38 Mbit/s 800.3 ms
Xi'an CM 108.79 Mbit/s 37.99 Mbit/s 188.43 ms
Shanghai CM 5.98 Mbit/s 10.76 Mbit/s 246.507 ms
Chengdu CM 12.60 Mbit/s 24.74 Mbit/s 198.129 ms
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Total time : 5 min 53 sec
Current time : 2018-06-02 23:47:18
Finished！
2、上传/下载带宽测试
Retrieving speedtest.net server list...
Selecting best server based on ping...
Hosted by Switch (Las Vegas, NV) [11.84 km]: 23.345 ms
Testing download speed.............................
Download: 113.06 Mbit/s
Testing upload speed...............................
Upload: 97.97 Mbit/s
3、国内访问速度
4、硬盘 I/O 性能测试
dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=64k count=4k oflag=dsync
4096+0 records in
4096+0 records out
268435456 bytes (268 MB) copied, 9.98576 s, 26.9 MB/s
5、UnixBench跑分
Benchmark Run: Sat Jun 02 2018 23:58:03 - 00:30:00
1 CPU in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 8272916.7 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 4143.8 MWIPS (10.4 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 2265.7 lps (29.6 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 567930.4 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 158048.7 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1060198.8 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 1117874.2 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 180957.4 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 8108.4 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 4144.4 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 561.3 lpm (60.1 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 1966656.4 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 8272916.7 708.9
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 4143.8 753.4
Execl Throughput 43.0 2265.7 526.9
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 567930.4 1434.2
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 158048.7 955.0
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 1060198.8 1827.9
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 1117874.2 898.6
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 180957.4 452.4
Process Creation 126.0 8108.4 643.5
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 4144.4 977.5
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 561.3 935.5
System Call Overhead 15000.0 1966656.4 1311.1
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 881.8
6、丢包测试
Ping from 192.168.0.29 to 104.160.xxx.xxx
==============================================================================
06/03 12:19:11.187 Ping to 104.160.xxx.xxx with 32 bytes of data and 32 of TTL:
06/03 12:19:11.401 PingMin #1 Reply 32 bytes from 104.160.xxx.xxx: time=210ms TTL=50, ave=210.00ms
06/03 12:19:12.403 PingMax #2 Reply 32 bytes from 104.160.xxx.xxx: time=215ms TTL=50, ave=212.50ms
06/03 12:19:13.424 PingMax #3 Reply 32 bytes from 104.160.xxx.xxx: time=237ms TTL=50, ave=220.67ms
06/03 12:19:14.478 PingMax #4 Reply 32 bytes from 104.160.xxx.xxx: time=292ms TTL=50, ave=238.50ms
06/03 12:19:35.167 超时 #24 *****(32 bytes) 请求超时。
06/03 12:19:44.494 PingMax #34 Reply 32 bytes from 104.160.xxx.xxx: time=305ms TTL=50, ave=235.15ms
06/03 12:19:53.579 PingMax #43 Reply 32 bytes from 104.160.xxx.xxx: time=393ms TTL=50, ave=239.33ms
06/03 12:19:54.584 PingMax #44 Reply 32 bytes from 104.160.xxx.xxx: time=395ms TTL=50, ave=242.95ms
06/03 12:20:06.590 PingMax #56 Reply 32 bytes from 104.160.xxx.xxx: time=401ms TTL=50, ave=251.00ms
06/03 12:20:13.607 PingMax #63 Reply 32 bytes from 104.160.xxx.xxx: time=418ms TTL=50, ave=254.29ms
06/03 12:20:22.167 超时 #71 *****(32 bytes) 请求超时。
06/03 12:20:24.622 PingMax #74 Reply 32 bytes from 104.160.xxx.xxx: time=436ms TTL=50, ave=265.60ms
06/03 12:20:46.167 超时 #95 *****(32 bytes) 请求超时。
06/03 12:20:46.685 PingMax #96 Reply 32 bytes from 104.160.xxx.xxx: time=494ms TTL=50, ave=282.84ms
06/03 12:20:50.693 PingMax #100 Reply 32 bytes from 104.160.xxx.xxx: time=506ms TTL=50, ave=286.21ms
06/03 12:20:50.694 === 100 有效发送, 97 接收, 3.00% 丢失, 286.21ms 平均值 ===
--- 结果 & 统计信息 ------------------------------------------------------
开始时间: 2018/06/03 12:19:11
经过时间: 000:01:39
结束时间: 2018/06/03 12:20:50
----------------
100 总计发送
0 无效接收 (除了超时的其它错误)
----------------
100 有效发送
97 有效接收
3 timed out (3.00% 丢失)
Ping 最小值 210ms, 最大值 506ms, 平均值 286.21ms
7、路由追踪
电信
联通
移动
8、Youtube速度测试
-
所有主机信息仅是为及时分享并收录，不做推荐！