详情：cbvps：2.8元/月/256MB内存/50GB空间/300GB流量/NAT/OpenVZ/香港
我入的是HK2 NAT VPS这款，ssd硬盘，从测试看，似乎带宽没限制，给力！
只希望可以长久存在下去，不要昙花一现。
1、系统信息、带宽、I/O测试
CPU model : Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-7600 CPU @ 3.50GHz
Number of cores : 2
CPU frequency : 800.000 MHz
Total size of Disk : 13.0 GB (0.6 GB Used)
Total amount of Mem : 1024 MB (25 MB Used)
Total amount of Swap : 1024 MB (0 MB Used)
System uptime : 0 days 12 hour 38 min
Load average : 0.08, 0.02, 0.01
OS : CentOS 6.8
Arch : x86_64 (64 Bit)
Kernel : 2.6.32-042stab128.2
Virt : openvz
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I/O speed( 32M ) : 395 MB/s
I/O speed( 256M ) : 358 MB/s
I/O speed( 2G ) : 497 MB/s
Average I/O speed : 416.7 MB/s
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Node Name Upload Speed Download Speed Latency
Normal Node 728.11 Mbit/s 49.25 Mbit/s 14.056 ms
Shanghai CT 36.92 Mbit/s 180.66 Mbit/s 59.045 ms
Xi'an CU 90.79 Mbit/s 97.33 Mbit/s 91.341 ms
Shanghai CU 141.48 Mbit/s 535.59 Mbit/s 54.655 ms
Chongqing CU 117.00 Mbit/s 376.62 Mbit/s 81.478 ms
Xi'an CM 310.26 Mbit/s 155.89 Mbit/s 36.206 ms
Shanghai CM 52.00 Mbit/s 19.20 Mbit/s 49.326 ms
Chengdu CM 15.63 Mbit/s 34.75 Mbit/s 235.919 ms
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Total time : 3 min 1 sec
Current time : 2018-05-16 20:53:49
Finished！
2、上传/下载带宽测试
Retrieving speedtest.net server list...
Selecting best server based on ping...
Hosted by HGC Global Communications Limited (Shatin) [5.08 km]: 16.583 ms
Testing download speed..........................................
Download: 732.49 Mbit/s
Testing upload speed............................................
Upload: 170.12 Mbit/s
3、国内访问速度
4、硬盘 I/O 性能测试
dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=64k count=4k oflag=dsync
4096+0 records in
4096+0 records out
268435456 bytes (268 MB) copied, 28.4272 s, 9.4 MB/s
5、UnixBench跑分
Benchmark Run: Wed May 16 2018 21:10:21 - 21:38:23
2 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 46271445.1 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 4684.8 MWIPS (9.8 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 3327.7 lps (29.6 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 688847.4 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 183559.3 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 2064924.4 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 1119325.5 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 132369.1 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 7502.3 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 7545.8 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1700.2 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 1011977.5 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 46271445.1 3965.0
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 4684.8 851.8
Execl Throughput 43.0 3327.7 773.9
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 688847.4 1739.5
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 183559.3 1109.1
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 2064924.4 3560.2
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 1119325.5 899.8
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 132369.1 330.9
Process Creation 126.0 7502.3 595.4
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 7545.8 1779.7
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 1700.2 2833.6
System Call Overhead 15000.0 1011977.5 674.7
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 1219.6
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benchmark Run: Wed May 16 2018 21:38:23 - 22:06:33
2 CPUs in system; running 2 parallel copies of tests
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 93772935.1 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 9138.4 MWIPS (10.2 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 11921.5 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 1038707.1 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 237374.8 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 2666690.8 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 2233170.6 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 497167.4 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 22308.1 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 10468.7 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1519.1 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 1875827.8 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 93772935.1 8035.4
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 9138.4 1661.5
Execl Throughput 43.0 11921.5 2772.4
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 1038707.1 2623.0
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 237374.8 1434.3
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 2666690.8 4597.7
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 2233170.6 1795.2
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 497167.4 1242.9
Process Creation 126.0 22308.1 1770.5
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 10468.7 2469.0
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 1519.1 2531.9
System Call Overhead 15000.0 1875827.8 1250.6
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 2280.4
6、丢包测试
Ping from 192.168.16.243 to 58.176.xxx.xxx
==============================================================================
05/17 09:01:54.374 Ping to 58.176.xxx.xxx with 32 bytes of data and 32 of TTL:
05/17 09:01:54.478 PingMin #1 Reply 32 bytes from 58.176.xxx.xxx: time=97ms TTL=46, ave=97.00ms
05/17 09:01:55.456 PingMin #2 Reply 32 bytes from 58.176.xxx.xxx: time=92ms TTL=46, ave=94.50ms
05/17 09:01:59.506 PingMax #6 Reply 32 bytes from 58.176.xxx.xxx: time=138ms TTL=46, ave=101.83ms
05/17 09:02:10.569 PingMax #17 Reply 32 bytes from 58.176.xxx.xxx: time=202ms TTL=46, ave=106.00ms
05/17 09:02:31.443 PingMin #38 Reply 32 bytes from 58.176.xxx.xxx: time=91ms TTL=46, ave=102.32ms
05/17 09:02:52.096 超时 #58 *****(32 bytes) 请求超时。
05/17 09:02:53.103 超时 #59 *****(32 bytes) 请求超时。
05/17 09:02:54.107 超时 #60 *****(32 bytes) 请求超时。
05/17 09:02:54.970 TooLate #61 Reply 32 bytes from 58.176.xxx.xxx: time=597ms TTL=46, ave=110.45ms
05/17 09:02:56.098 超时 #62 *****(32 bytes) 请求超时。
05/17 09:02:57.096 超时 #63 *****(32 bytes) 请求超时。
05/17 09:02:58.096 超时 #64 *****(32 bytes) 请求超时。
05/17 09:02:59.100 超时 #65 *****(32 bytes) 请求超时。
05/17 09:03:00.096 超时 #66 *****(32 bytes) 请求超时。
05/17 09:03:01.100 超时 #67 *****(32 bytes) 请求超时。
05/17 09:03:02.109 超时 #68 *****(32 bytes) 请求超时。
05/17 09:03:04.101 超时 #70 *****(32 bytes) 请求超时。
05/17 09:03:05.095 超时 #71 *****(32 bytes) 请求超时。
05/17 09:03:06.103 超时 #72 *****(32 bytes) 请求超时。
05/17 09:03:07.095 超时 #73 *****(32 bytes) 请求超时。
05/17 09:03:08.109 超时 #74 *****(32 bytes) 请求超时。
05/17 09:03:20.727 TooLate #87 Reply 32 bytes from 58.176.xxx.xxx: time=351ms TTL=46, ave=112.24ms
05/17 09:03:21.650 TooLate #88 Reply 32 bytes from 58.176.xxx.xxx: time=294ms TTL=46, ave=114.73ms
05/17 09:03:23.096 超时 #89 *****(32 bytes) 请求超时。
05/17 09:03:26.751 TooLate #93 Reply 32 bytes from 58.176.xxx.xxx: time=378ms TTL=46, ave=118.19ms
05/17 09:03:27.721 TooLate #94 Reply 32 bytes from 58.176.xxx.xxx: time=347ms TTL=46, ave=121.13ms
05/17 09:03:33.461 === 100 有效发送, 84 接收, 16.00% 丢失, 119.35ms 平均值 ===
--- 结果 & 统计信息 ------------------------------------------------------
开始时间: 2018/05/17 09:01:54
经过时间: 000:01:39
结束时间: 2018/05/17 09:03:33
----------------
100 总计发送
0 无效接收 (除了超时的其它错误)
----------------
100 有效发送
84 有效接收
16 timed out (16.00% 丢失)
Ping 最小值 91ms, 最大值 597ms, 平均值 119.35ms
7、路由追踪
电信
联通
8、Youtube速度测试
联通
-
所有主机信息仅是为及时分享并收录，不做推荐！