详情：BandwidthServer：$15/年/512MB内存/15GB空间/2TB流量/KVM/洛杉矶QN
暂时看，挺不错。相比于其他几家的低价KVM VPS，价格相对高，这样的话性能、网络等可以较有保证。
1、系统信息、带宽、I/O测试
CPU model : QEMU Virtual CPU version (cpu64-rhel6)
Number of cores : 1
CPU frequency : 2400.084 MHz
Total size of Disk : 29.5 GB (0.9 GB Used)
Total amount of Mem : 996 MB (32 MB Used)
Total amount of Swap : 1023 MB (0 MB Used)
System uptime : 0 days 22 hour 58 min
Load average : 0.00, 0.00, 0.00
OS : Debian GNU/Linux 9
Arch : x86_64 (64 Bit)
Kernel : 4.9.0-4-amd64
Virt : kvm
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I/O speed( 32M ) : 214 MB/s
I/O speed( 256M ) : 376 MB/s
I/O speed( 2G ) : 265 MB/s
Average I/O speed : 285.0 MB/s
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Node Name Upload Speed Download Speed Latency
Normal Node 106.64 Mbit/s 108.62 Mbit/s 2.205 ms
Xiangyang CT 21.98 Mbit/s 74.57 Mbit/s 281.009 ms
Chengdu CT 29.03 Mbit/s 67.95 Mbit/s 197.661 ms
Xi'an CU 42.45 Mbit/s 56.59 Mbit/s 269.401 ms
Shanghai CU 25.10 Mbit/s 4.90 Mbit/s 173.4 ms
Chongqing CU 29.17 Mbit/s 31.57 Mbit/s 247.451 ms
Xi'an CM 65.35 Mbit/s 73.87 Mbit/s 224.008 ms
Shanghai CM 8.10 Mbit/s 17.52 Mbit/s 185.757 ms
Chengdu CM 19.98 Mbit/s 44.45 Mbit/s 212.144 ms
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Total time : 3 min 43 sec
Current time : 2018-04-28 00:47:23
Finished！
2、上传/下载带宽测试
Retrieving speedtest.net server list...
Selecting best server based on ping...
Hosted by SingTel (Los Angeles, CA) [1.30 km]: 5.616 ms
Testing download speed................................................................................
Download: 108.81 Mbit/s
Testing upload speed................................................................................................
Upload: 70.30 Mbit/s
3、国内访问速度
4、硬盘 I/O 性能测试
dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=64k count=4k oflag=dsync
4096+0 records in
4096+0 records out
268435456 bytes (268 MB, 256 MiB) copied, 4.30192 s, 62.4 MB/s
5、UnixBench跑分
Benchmark Run: Sat Apr 28 2018 01:02:28 - 01:32:01
1 CPU in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 16988505.8 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 3088.3 MWIPS (9.9 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 2394.6 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 503331.5 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 240921.0 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1687289.6 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 1745218.4 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 232468.4 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 9850.0 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 7256.2 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 966.4 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 2699702.0 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 16988505.8 1455.7
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 3088.3 561.5
Execl Throughput 43.0 2394.6 556.9
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 503331.5 1271.0
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 240921.0 1455.7
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 1687289.6 2909.1
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 1745218.4 1402.9
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 232468.4 581.2
Process Creation 126.0 9850.0 781.7
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 7256.2 1711.4
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 966.4 1610.7
System Call Overhead 15000.0 2699702.0 1799.8
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 1186.0
6、丢包测试
Ping from 10.0.0.16 to 216.45.xxx.xxx
==============================================================================
04/28 12:53:07.648 Ping to 216.45.xxx.xxx with 32 bytes of data and 32 of TTL:
04/28 12:53:07.921 PingMin #1 Reply 32 bytes from 216.45.xxx.xxx: time=271ms TTL=52, ave=271.00ms
04/28 12:53:08.910 PingMin #2 Reply 32 bytes from 216.45.xxx.xxx: time=259ms TTL=52, ave=265.00ms
04/28 12:53:09.936 PingMax #3 Reply 32 bytes from 216.45.xxx.xxx: time=283ms TTL=52, ave=271.00ms
04/28 12:53:12.907 PingMin #6 Reply 32 bytes from 216.45.xxx.xxx: time=256ms TTL=52, ave=268.50ms
04/28 12:53:13.901 PingMin #7 Reply 32 bytes from 216.45.xxx.xxx: time=251ms TTL=52, ave=266.00ms
04/28 12:53:18.881 PingMin #12 Reply 32 bytes from 216.45.xxx.xxx: time=230ms TTL=52, ave=264.50ms
04/28 12:53:19.858 PingMin #13 Reply 32 bytes from 216.45.xxx.xxx: time=208ms TTL=52, ave=260.15ms
04/28 12:53:20.857 PingMin #14 Reply 32 bytes from 216.45.xxx.xxx: time=206ms TTL=52, ave=256.29ms
04/28 12:53:33.941 PingMax #27 Reply 32 bytes from 216.45.xxx.xxx: time=291ms TTL=52, ave=254.59ms
04/28 12:53:50.027 PingMax #43 Reply 32 bytes from 216.45.xxx.xxx: time=374ms TTL=52, ave=263.14ms
04/28 12:53:52.090 PingMax #45 Reply 32 bytes from 216.45.xxx.xxx: time=439ms TTL=52, ave=267.62ms
04/28 12:54:26.179 超时 #79 *****(32 bytes) 请求超时。
04/28 12:54:46.938 === 100 有效发送, 99 接收, 1.00% 丢失, 266.71ms 平均值 ===
--- 结果 & 统计信息 ------------------------------------------------------
开始时间: 2018/04/28 12:53:07
经过时间: 000:01:39
结束时间: 2018/04/28 12:54:46
----------------
100 总计发送
0 无效接收 (除了超时的其它错误)
----------------
100 有效发送
99 有效接收
1 timed out (1.00% 丢失)
Ping 最小值 206ms, 最大值 439ms, 平均值 266.71ms
7、去程路由追踪
电信
联通
8、Youtube速度测试
-
所有主机信息仅是为及时分享并收录，不做推荐！