详情：WootHosting：$19/年/2GB内存/50GB空间/2TB流量/OpenVZ/洛杉矶/迈阿密/纽约
所谓的CLOUD RESOURCE POOL，就是一个大母鸡，你可以开多个小鸡，30刀这款可以开4个，可选洛杉矶、纽约、迈阿密数据中心，或者就建1个，配置强，这样看，其实挺不错。
网络一般，IO挺好，配置不如洛杉矶。
1、系统信息、带宽、I/O测试
CPU model : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5620 @ 2.40GHz
Number of cores : 4
CPU frequency : 2400.333 MHz
Total size of Disk : 100.0 GB (0.5 GB Used)
Total amount of Mem : 4096 MB (8 MB Used)
Total amount of Swap : 0 MB (0 MB Used)
System uptime : 0 days, 19 hour 22 min
Load average : 0.00, 0.00, 0.00
OS : CentOS 7.2.1511
Arch : x86_64 (64 Bit)
Kernel : 2.6.32-042stab125.5
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I/O speed(1st run) : 870 MB/s
I/O speed(2nd run) : 861 MB/s
I/O speed(3rd run) : 934 MB/s
Average I/O speed : 888.3 MB/s
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Node Name IPv4 address Download Speed
CacheFly 205.234.175.175 65.7MB/s
Linode, Tokyo, JP 106.187.96.148 73.0KB/s
Linode, Singapore, SG 139.162.23.4 1.15MB/s
Linode, London, UK 176.58.107.39 2.19MB/s
Linode, Frankfurt, DE 139.162.130.8 3.20MB/s
Linode, Fremont, CA 50.116.14.9 927KB/s
Softlayer, Dallas, TX 173.192.68.18 2.10MB/s
Softlayer, Seattle, WA 67.228.112.250 1.06MB/s
Softlayer, Frankfurt, DE 159.122.69.4 1.01MB/s
Softlayer, Singapore, SG 119.81.28.170 598KB/s
Softlayer, HongKong, CN 119.81.130.170 1.33MB/s
2、上传/下载带宽测试
Retrieving speedtest.net server list...
Selecting best server based on ping...
Hosted by fdcservers.net (Miami, FL) [4.24 km]: 3.051 ms
Testing download speed................................................................................
Download: 157.56 Mbit/s
Testing upload speed................................................................................................
Upload: 136.11 Mbit/s
3、国内访问速度
4、硬盘 I/O 性能测试
dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=64k count=4k oflag=dsync
4096+0 records in
4096+0 records out
268435456 bytes (268 MB) copied, 0.316947 s, 847 MB/s
5、UnixBench跑分
Benchmark Run: Thu Dec 28 2017 08:33:39 - 09:02:05
4 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 19991455.2 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 2918.0 MWIPS (9.9 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 1783.9 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 405330.9 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 105075.5 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 862247.8 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 868892.0 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 92364.4 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 4923.6 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 2891.2 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 636.9 lpm (60.1 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 1320746.4 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 19991455.2 1713.1
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 2918.0 530.6
Execl Throughput 43.0 1783.9 414.8
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 405330.9 1023.6
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 105075.5 634.9
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 862247.8 1486.6
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 868892.0 698.5
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 92364.4 230.9
Process Creation 126.0 4923.6 390.8
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 2891.2 681.9
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 636.9 1061.5
System Call Overhead 15000.0 1320746.4 880.5
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 703.2
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benchmark Run: Thu Dec 28 2017 09:02:05 - 09:32:25
4 CPUs in system; running 4 parallel copies of tests
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 42353000.9 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 11103.0 MWIPS (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 6256.5 lps (29.5 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 357264.3 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 99367.7 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 733178.5 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 1504879.4 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 239181.9 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 14008.9 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 7895.1 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 900.3 lpm (60.1 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 2701143.6 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 42353000.9 3629.2
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 11103.0 2018.7
Execl Throughput 43.0 6256.5 1455.0
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 357264.3 902.2
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 99367.7 600.4
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 733178.5 1264.1
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 1504879.4 1209.7
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 239181.9 598.0
Process Creation 126.0 14008.9 1111.8
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 7895.1 1862.1
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 900.3 1500.6
System Call Overhead 15000.0 2701143.6 1800.8
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 1326.0
6、丢包测试
Ping from 192.168.103.55 to 167.160.xxx.xxx
==============================================================================
12/28 19:42:01.442 Ping to 167.160.xxx.xxx with 32 bytes of data and 32 of TTL:
12/28 19:42:02.430 超时 #1 *****(32 bytes) 请求超时。
12/28 19:42:03.430 超时 #2 *****(32 bytes) 请求超时。
12/28 19:42:03.734 PingMin #3 Reply 32 bytes from 167.160.xxx.xxx: time=300ms TTL=48, ave=300.00ms
12/28 19:42:05.430 超时 #4 *****(32 bytes) 请求超时。
12/28 19:42:06.430 超时 #5 *****(32 bytes) 请求超时。
12/28 19:42:07.430 超时 #6 *****(32 bytes) 请求超时。
12/28 19:42:07.737 PingMax #7 Reply 32 bytes from 167.160.xxx.xxx: time=302ms TTL=48, ave=301.00ms
12/28 19:42:09.430 超时 #8 *****(32 bytes) 请求超时。
12/28 19:42:10.430 超时 #9 *****(32 bytes) 请求超时。
12/28 19:42:11.430 超时 #10 *****(32 bytes) 请求超时。
12/28 19:42:11.739 PingMax #11 Reply 32 bytes from 167.160.xxx.xxx: time=303ms TTL=48, ave=301.67ms
12/28 19:42:13.430 超时 #12 *****(32 bytes) 请求超时。
12/28 19:42:15.430 超时 #14 *****(32 bytes) 请求超时。
12/28 19:42:16.430 超时 #15 *****(32 bytes) 请求超时。
12/28 19:42:16.736 PingMax #16 Reply 32 bytes from 167.160.xxx.xxx: time=304ms TTL=48, ave=302.00ms
12/28 19:42:18.430 超时 #17 *****(32 bytes) 请求超时。
12/28 19:42:18.739 PingMax #18 Reply 32 bytes from 167.160.xxx.xxx: time=305ms TTL=48, ave=302.50ms
12/28 19:42:19.747 PingMax #19 Reply 32 bytes from 167.160.xxx.xxx: time=313ms TTL=48, ave=304.00ms
12/28 19:42:21.430 超时 #20 *****(32 bytes) 请求超时。
12/28 19:42:21.430 === 20 有效发送, 7 接收, 65.00% 丢失, 304.00ms 平均值 ===
--- 结果 & 统计信息 ------------------------------------------------------
开始时间: 2017/12/28 19:42:01
经过时间: 000:00:20
结束时间: 2017/12/28 19:42:21
----------------
20 总计发送
0 无效接收 (除了超时的其它错误)
----------------
20 有效发送
7 有效接收
13 timed out (65.00% 丢失)
Ping 最小值 300ms, 最大值 313ms, 平均值 304.00ms
7、路由追踪
电信
联通
-
所有主机信息仅是为及时分享并收录，不做推荐！