详情：Linode：$5/月/1GB内存/20GB SSD空间/1TB流量/KVM/日本/新加坡
这样的价格，加上这样的配置，而且数年的稳定保障，国内访问速度很不错，服务态度好，帮助文档极度详细。
稳定建站的必选！！！
1、系统信息、带宽、I/O测试
CPU model : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2697 v4 @ 2.30GHz
Number of cores : 1
CPU frequency : 2299.990 MHz
Total size of Disk : 20.0 GB (1.2 GB Used)
Total amount of Mem : 992 MB (531 MB Used)
Total amount of Swap : 511 MB (0 MB Used)
System uptime : 0 days, 0 hour 11 min
Load average : 0.24, 0.23, 0.10
OS : CentOS 6.9
Arch : x86_64 (64 Bit)
Kernel : 4.0.2-x86_64-linode56
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I/O speed(1st run) : 1.1 GB/s
I/O speed(2nd run) : 1.1 GB/s
I/O speed(3rd run) : 1.1 GB/s
Average I/O speed : 1126.4 MB/s
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Node Name IPv4 address Download Speed
CacheFly 205.234.175.175 136MB/s
Linode, Tokyo, JP 106.187.96.148 15.5MB/s
Linode, Singapore, SG 139.162.23.4 5.92MB/s
Linode, London, UK 176.58.107.39 13.0MB/s
Linode, Frankfurt, DE 139.162.130.8 13.6MB/s
Linode, Fremont, CA 50.116.14.9 2.91MB/s
Softlayer, Dallas, TX 173.192.68.18 111MB/s
Softlayer, Seattle, WA 67.228.112.250 52.3MB/s
Softlayer, Frankfurt, DE 159.122.69.4 11.7MB/s
Softlayer, Singapore, SG 119.81.28.170 10.1MB/s
Softlayer, HongKong, CN 119.81.130.170 12.3MB/s
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Node Name IPv6 address Download Speed
Linode, Atlanta, GA 2600:3c02::4b 50.8MB/s
Linode, Dallas, TX 2600:3c00::4b 125MB/s
Linode, Newark, NJ 2600:3c03::4b 27.2MB/s
Linode, Singapore, SG 2400:8901::4b 5.90MB/s
Linode, Tokyo, JP 2400:8900::4b 17.2MB/s
Softlayer, San Jose, CA 2607:f0d0:2601:2a::4 36.5MB/s
Softlayer, Washington, WA 2607:f0d0:3001:78::2 3.08MB/s
Softlayer, Paris, FR 2a03:8180:1301:8::4 19.6MB/s
Softlayer, Singapore, SG 2401:c900:1101:8::2 10.2MB/s
Softlayer, Tokyo, JP 2401:c900:1001:16::4 14.2MB/s
2、上传/下载带宽测试
Hosted by TRANSTELCO (Dallas, TX) [1.73 km]: 7.422 ms
Testing download speed..................................
Download: 458.78 Mbit/s
Testing upload speed....................................
Upload: 405.85 Mbit/s
3、国内访问速度
4、硬盘 I/O 性能测试
dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=64k count=4k oflag=dsync
4096+0 records in
4096+0 records out
268435456 bytes (268 MB) copied, 1.28764 s, 208 MB/s
5、UnixBench跑分
Benchmark Run: Thu Jun 15 2017 11:52:12 - 12:20:18
1 CPU in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 27388043.5 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 3310.8 MWIPS (9.8 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 5204.4 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 833198.8 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 223252.4 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 2484268.7 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 1340988.5 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 282804.9 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 14496.0 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 5415.4 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 732.5 lpm (60.1 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 2021011.3 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 27388043.5 2346.9
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 3310.8 602.0
Execl Throughput 43.0 5204.4 1210.3
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 833198.8 2104.0
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 223252.4 1349.0
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 2484268.7 4283.2
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 1340988.5 1078.0
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 282804.9 707.0
Process Creation 126.0 14496.0 1150.5
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 5415.4 1277.2
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 732.5 1220.9
System Call Overhead 15000.0 2021011.3 1347.3
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 1355.0
6、丢包测试 未安装锐速
Ping from 192.168.1.29 to 173.255.199.212
==============================================================================
06/15 19:56:18.181 Ping to 173.255.199.212 with 32 bytes of data and 32 of TTL:
06/15 19:56:18.454 PingMin #1 Reply 32 bytes from 173.255.199.212: time=270ms TTL=49, ave=270.00ms
06/15 19:56:19.457 PingMax #2 Reply 32 bytes from 173.255.199.212: time=274ms TTL=49, ave=272.00ms
06/15 19:56:21.179 超时 #3 *****(32 bytes) 请求超时。
06/15 19:56:23.179 超时 #5 *****(32 bytes) 请求超时。
06/15 19:56:24.179 超时 #6 *****(32 bytes) 请求超时。
06/15 19:56:24.456 PingMax #7 Reply 32 bytes from 173.255.199.212: time=275ms TTL=49, ave=272.75ms
06/15 19:56:27.179 超时 #9 *****(32 bytes) 请求超时。
06/15 19:56:27.439 PingMin #10 Reply 32 bytes from 173.255.199.212: time=253ms TTL=49, ave=269.67ms
06/15 19:56:28.436 PingMin #11 Reply 32 bytes from 173.255.199.212: time=252ms TTL=49, ave=267.14ms
06/15 19:56:34.179 超时 #16 *****(32 bytes) 请求超时。
06/15 19:56:35.179 超时 #17 *****(32 bytes) 请求超时。
06/15 19:56:36.179 超时 #18 *****(32 bytes) 请求超时。
06/15 19:56:38.179 超时 #20 *****(32 bytes) 请求超时。
06/15 19:56:38.181 === 20 有效发送, 12 接收, 40.00% 丢失, 267.92ms 平均值 ===
--- 结果 & 统计信息 ------------------------------------------------------
开始时间: 2017/06/15 19:56:18
经过时间: 000:00:20
结束时间: 2017/06/15 19:56:38
----------------
20 总计发送
0 无效接收 (除了超时的其它错误)
----------------
20 有效发送
12 有效接收
8 timed out (40.00% 丢失)
Ping 最小值 252ms, 最大值 275ms, 平均值 267.92ms
7、路由追踪
电信
联通
8、Youtube速度测试
-
所有主机信息仅是为及时分享并收录，不做推荐！