详情：Linode：$5/月/1GB内存/20GB SSD空间/1TB流量/KVM/日本/新加坡
这样的价格，加上这样的配置，而且数年的稳定保障，国内访问速度很不错，服务态度好，帮助文档极度详细。稳定建站的必选！！！
1、系统信息及带宽测试
CPU model : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2697 v4 @ 2.30GHz
Number of cores : 1
CPU frequency : 2299.994 MHz
Total size of Disk : 20.0 GB (0.8 GB Used)
Total amount of Mem : 989 MB (575 MB Used)
Total amount of Swap : 511 MB (0 MB Used)
System uptime : 0 days, 0 hour 45 min
Load average : 0.31, 0.20, 0.08
OS : CentOS 6.8
Arch : x86_64 (64 Bit)
Kernel : 4.8.6-x86_64-linode78
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I/O speed(1st run) : 659 MB/s
I/O speed(2nd run) : 781 MB/s
I/O speed(3rd run) : 788 MB/s
Average I/O speed : 742.7 MB/s
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Node Name IPv4 address Download Speed
CacheFly 204.93.150.152 5.29MB/s
Linode, Tokyo, JP 106.187.96.148 73.7MB/s
Linode, Singapore, SG 139.162.23.4 23.8MB/s
Linode, London, UK 176.58.107.39 7.03MB/s
Linode, Frankfurt, DE 139.162.130.8 8.23MB/s
Linode, Fremont, CA 50.116.14.9 17.9MB/s
Softlayer, Dallas, TX 173.192.68.18 12.5MB/s
Softlayer, Seattle, WA 67.228.112.250 19.9MB/s
Softlayer, Frankfurt, DE 159.122.69.4 3.43MB/s
Softlayer, Singapore, SG 119.81.28.170 25.0MB/s
Softlayer, HongKong, CN 119.81.130.170 35.8MB/s
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Node Name IPv6 address Download Speed
Linode, Atlanta, GA 2600:3c02::4b 3.84MB/s
Linode, Dallas, TX 2600:3c00::4b 13.7MB/s
Linode, Newark, NJ 2600:3c03::4b 11.4MB/s
Linode, Singapore, SG 2400:8901::4b 7.71MB/s
Linode, Tokyo, JP 2400:8900::4b 77.5MB/s
Softlayer, San Jose, CA 2607:f0d0:2601:2a::4 8.61MB/s
Softlayer, Washington, WA 2607:f0d0:3001:78::2 4.40MB/s
Softlayer, Paris, FR 2a03:8180:1301:8::4 7.37MB/s
Softlayer, Singapore, SG 2401:c900:1101:8::2 22.8MB/s
Softlayer, Tokyo, JP 2401:c900:1001:16::4 201MB/s
2、上传/下载带宽测试
Selecting best server based on ping...
Hosted by at2wn (Yokohama) [24.99 km]: 115.053 ms
Testing download speed...............................................
Download: 426.63 Mbit/s
Testing upload speed.................................................
Upload: 226.73 Mbit/s
3、国内访问速度
4、测试硬盘 I/O 性能
dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=64k count=4k oflag=dsync
4096+0 records in
4096+0 records out
268435456 bytes (268 MB) copied, 2.70453 s, 99.3 MB/s
5、UnixBench跑分
Benchmark Run: Wed Feb 15 2017 01:55:07 - 02:23:13
1 CPU in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 27110732.5 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 3271.2 MWIPS (9.9 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 5700.9 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 993071.9 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 272347.4 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 2773598.7 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 1754931.9 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 330300.0 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 16502.0 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 5550.6 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 727.1 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 1976183.2 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 27110732.5 2323.1
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 3271.2 594.8
Execl Throughput 43.0 5700.9 1325.8
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 993071.9 2507.8
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 272347.4 1645.6
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 2773598.7 4782.1
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 1754931.9 1410.7
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 330300.0 825.8
Process Creation 126.0 16502.0 1309.7
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 5550.6 1309.1
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 727.1 1211.9
System Call Overhead 15000.0 1976183.2 1317.5
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 1485.3
6、丢包测试
Ping from 192.168.1.186 to 139.162.xxx.xxx
==============================================================================
02/15 09:54:40.403 Ping to 139.162.xxx.xxx with 32 bytes of data and 32 of TTL:
02/15 09:54:40.527 PingMin #1 Reply 32 bytes from 139.162.xxx.xxx: time=119ms TTL=50, ave=119.00ms
02/15 09:54:41.506 PingMin #2 Reply 32 bytes from 139.162.xxx.xxx: time=106ms TTL=50, ave=112.50ms
02/15 09:54:42.529 PingMax #3 Reply 32 bytes from 139.162.xxx.xxx: time=123ms TTL=50, ave=116.00ms
02/15 09:54:44.530 PingMax #5 Reply 32 bytes from 139.162.xxx.xxx: time=126ms TTL=50, ave=118.60ms
02/15 09:54:45.534 PingMax #6 Reply 32 bytes from 139.162.xxx.xxx: time=129ms TTL=50, ave=120.33ms
02/15 09:54:49.535 PingMax #10 Reply 32 bytes from 139.162.xxx.xxx: time=131ms TTL=50, ave=121.80ms
02/15 09:54:52.501 PingMin #13 Reply 32 bytes from 139.162.xxx.xxx: time=100ms TTL=50, ave=119.69ms
02/15 09:54:54.492 PingMin #15 Reply 32 bytes from 139.162.xxx.xxx: time=90ms TTL=50, ave=116.60ms
02/15 09:54:58.498 PingMin #19 Reply 32 bytes from 139.162.xxx.xxx: time=84ms TTL=50, ave=111.47ms
02/15 09:54:59.484 === 20 有效发送, 20 接收, 0.00% 丢失, 110.25ms 平均值 ===
--- 结果 & 统计信息 ------------------------------------------------------
开始时间: 2017/02/15 09:54:40
经过时间: 000:00:19
结束时间: 2017/02/15 09:54:59
----------------
20 总计发送
0 无效接收 (除了超时的其它错误)
----------------
20 有效发送
20 有效接收
0 timed out (0.00% 丢失)
Ping 最小值 84ms, 最大值 131ms, 平均值 110.25ms
7、路由追踪
8、Youtube测试
-
所有主机信息仅是为及时分享并收录，不做推荐！