hostdare 1GB内存 KVM VPS 洛杉矶 简单测评

lisahost.com

hostdare,很不错的小商家,产品好,服务态度优秀,下面是新提出的kvm vps测评。
详情:HostDare:$32/年/1GB内存/20GB SSD空间/1TB流量/KVM/洛杉矶/亚洲优化

系统信息及带宽测试

System Info
-----------
Processor       : QEMU Virtual CPU version (cpu64-rhel6)
CPU Cores       : 1
Frequency       : 3503.978 MHz
Memory          : 996 MB
Swap            : 1023 MB
Uptime          : 54 min,
OS              : CentOS release 6.6 (Final)
Arch            : x86_64 (64 Bit)
Kernel          : 2.6.32-504.23.4.el6.x86_64
Hostname        : test
Speedtest (IPv4 only)
---------------------
Your public IPv4 is 103.79.xxx.xxx
Location                Provider        Speed
CDN                     Cachefly        81.2MB/s
Atlanta, GA, US         Coloat          6.79MB/s
Dallas, TX, US          Softlayer       24.2MB/s
Seattle, WA, US         Softlayer       22.1MB/s
San Jose, CA, US        Softlayer       74.0MB/s
Washington, DC, US      Softlayer       26.2MB/s
Tokyo, Japan            Linode          16.8MB/s
Singapore               Softlayer       8.01MB/s
Rotterdam, Netherlands  id3.net         5.66MB/s
Haarlem, Netherlands    Leaseweb        21.7MB/s
Disk Speed
----------
I/O (1st run)   : 449 MB/s
I/O (2nd run)   : 365 MB/s
I/O (3rd run)   : 384 MB/s
Average I/O     : 399.333 MB/s

硬盘 I/O 性能

hdparm -t /dev/vda1
/dev/vda1:
 Timing buffered disk reads: 2856 MB in  3.00 seconds = 951.67 MB/sec

UnixBench跑分

Benchmark Run: Wed Dec 21 2016 10:02:54 - 10:30:57
1 CPU in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests
Dhrystone 2 using register variables       41577522.6 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone                     4201.9 MWIPS (9.9 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput                               5558.2 lps   (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks       1263474.5 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks          356241.0 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks       3178078.1 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput                             2321058.2 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching                 484503.7 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation                              16499.1 lps   (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                   7169.1 lpm   (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                    958.9 lpm   (60.0 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead                        3401972.6 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
System Benchmarks Index Values               BASELINE       RESULT    INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables         116700.0   41577522.6   3562.8
Double-Precision Whetstone                       55.0       4201.9    764.0
Execl Throughput                                 43.0       5558.2   1292.6
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks          3960.0    1263474.5   3190.6
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks            1655.0     356241.0   2152.5
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks          5800.0    3178078.1   5479.4
Pipe Throughput                               12440.0    2321058.2   1865.8
Pipe-based Context Switching                   4000.0     484503.7   1211.3
Process Creation                                126.0      16499.1   1309.5
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                     42.4       7169.1   1690.8
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                      6.0        958.9   1598.2
System Call Overhead                          15000.0    3401972.6   2268.0
                                                                   ========
System Benchmarks Index Score                                        1913.0

国内ping
hostdare-kvm.jpg

上传/下载带宽测试

Testing download speed......................
Download: 505.95 Mbit/s
Testing upload speed........................
Upload: 436.88 Mbit/s

丢包测试

Ping from 192.168.1.243 to 103.79.xxx.xxx
==============================================================================
01/07 11:42:17.816         Ping to 103.79.xxx.xxx with 32 bytes of data and 32 of TTL:
01/07 11:42:18.017 PingMin #1 Reply 32 bytes from 103.79.xxx.xxx: time=190ms TTL=48, ave=190.00ms
01/07 11:42:19.005 PingMin #2 Reply 32 bytes from 103.79.xxx.xxx: time=189ms TTL=48, ave=189.50ms
01/07 11:42:20.009 PingMax #3 Reply 32 bytes from 103.79.xxx.xxx: time=191ms TTL=48, ave=190.00ms
01/07 11:42:22.010 PingMax #5 Reply 32 bytes from 103.79.xxx.xxx: time=192ms TTL=48, ave=190.60ms
01/07 11:42:27.026 PingMax #10 Reply 32 bytes from 103.79.xxx.xxx: time=199ms TTL=48, ave=191.20ms
01/07 11:42:28.010 PingMin #11 Reply 32 bytes from 103.79.xxx.xxx: time=188ms TTL=48, ave=190.91ms
01/07 11:42:37.013 PingMin #20 Reply 32 bytes from 103.79.xxx.xxx: time=187ms TTL=48, ave=190.30ms
01/07 11:42:37.013         === 20 有效发送,   20 接收,     0.00% 丢失, 190.30ms 平均值  ===
--- 结果 & 统计信息 ------------------------------------------------------
开始时间:  2017/01/07 11:42:17
经过时间:            000:00:19
结束时间:  2017/01/07 11:42:37
----------------
    20 总计发送
    0 无效接收 (除了超时的其它错误)
----------------
    20 有效发送
    20 有效接收
    0 timed out (0.00% 丢失)
Ping 最小值  187ms, 最大值  199ms, 平均值  190.30ms
    所有主机信息仅是为及时分享并收录,不做推荐!