TragicServers 1GB内存 KVM VPS 洛杉矶 简单测评

分类 主机测评  最后修订: 2016年11月30日 18:28:00

TragicServers,小而优的主机商,KVM VPS其实不错,OpenVZ的超售较多,不建议购买。
详情:TragicServers:$2.99/月/1GB内存/20GB SSD空间/1TB流量/KVM/洛杉矶
节点:Node kvm-e5la2

系统信息及带宽测试

System Info
-----------
Processor   : QEMU Virtual CPU version (cpu64-rhel6)
CPU Cores   : 2
Frequency   : 2400.084 MHz
Memory      : 996 MB
Swap        : 127 MB
Uptime      : 18 min,

OS      : CentOS release 6.8 (Final)
Arch        : x86_64 (64 Bit)
Kernel      : 2.6.32-504.23.4.el6.x86_64
Hostname    : localhost.localdomain


Speedtest (IPv4 only)
---------------------
Your public IPv4 is 107.161.xxx.xxx

Location        Provider    Speed
CDN         Cachefly    28.7MB/s

Atlanta, GA, US     Coloat      1.95MB/s 
Dallas, TX, US      Softlayer   4.41MB/s 
Seattle, WA, US     Softlayer   5.42MB/s 
San Jose, CA, US    Softlayer   10.7MB/s 
Washington, DC, US  Softlayer   3.87MB/s 

Tokyo, Japan        Linode      2.27MB/s 
Singapore       Softlayer   2.18MB/s 

Rotterdam, Netherlands  id3.net     1.60MB/s
Haarlem, Netherlands    Leaseweb    6.10MB/s 


Disk Speed
----------
I/O (1st run)   : 221 MB/s
I/O (2nd run)   : 231 MB/s
I/O (3rd run)   : 240 MB/s
Average I/O : 230.667 MB/s

硬盘 I/O 性能

hdparm -t /dev/vda1
/dev/vda1:
Timing buffered disk reads: 716 MB in  3.01 seconds = 238.13 MB/sec

UnixBench跑分

Benchmark Run: Wed Nov 30 2016 04:25:25 - 04:53:38
2 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests

Dhrystone 2 using register variables       22885347.5 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone                     2869.3 MWIPS (9.9 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput                               1438.3 lps   (29.9 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks        414113.5 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks          116705.0 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks       1015928.5 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput                             1004428.3 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching                 170219.4 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation                               3345.0 lps   (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                   3073.0 lpm   (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                    706.3 lpm   (60.1 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead                        1553467.2 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)

System Benchmarks Index Values               BASELINE       RESULT    INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables         116700.0   22885347.5   1961.0
Double-Precision Whetstone                       55.0       2869.3    521.7
Execl Throughput                                 43.0       1438.3    334.5
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks          3960.0     414113.5   1045.7
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks            1655.0     116705.0    705.2
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks          5800.0    1015928.5   1751.6
Pipe Throughput                               12440.0    1004428.3    807.4
Pipe-based Context Switching                   4000.0     170219.4    425.5
Process Creation                                126.0       3345.0    265.5
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                     42.4       3073.0    724.8
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                      6.0        706.3   1177.2
System Call Overhead                          15000.0    1553467.2   1035.6
                                                                   ========
System Benchmarks Index Score                                         757.4

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benchmark Run: Wed Nov 30 2016 04:53:38 - 05:21:49
2 CPUs in system; running 2 parallel copies of tests

Dhrystone 2 using register variables       43515822.3 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone                     5737.8 MWIPS (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput                               4308.1 lps   (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks        551586.6 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks          166746.1 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks       1537485.6 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput                             1990248.7 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching                 331458.6 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation                              11676.2 lps   (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                   6191.1 lpm   (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                    820.5 lpm   (60.1 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead                        2660421.7 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)

System Benchmarks Index Values               BASELINE       RESULT    INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables         116700.0   43515822.3   3728.9
Double-Precision Whetstone                       55.0       5737.8   1043.2
Execl Throughput                                 43.0       4308.1   1001.9
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks          3960.0     551586.6   1392.9
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks            1655.0     166746.1   1007.5
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks          5800.0    1537485.6   2650.8
Pipe Throughput                               12440.0    1990248.7   1599.9
Pipe-based Context Switching                   4000.0     331458.6    828.6
Process Creation                                126.0      11676.2    926.7
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                     42.4       6191.1   1460.2
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                      6.0        820.5   1367.5
System Call Overhead                          15000.0    2660421.7   1773.6
                                                                   ========
System Benchmarks Index Score                                        1412.5

国内ping
TragicServers.png

路由追踪
TragicServers2.png

丢包测试

Ping from 192.168.1.102 to 107.161.xxx.xxx
==============================================================================
11/30 17:20:10.841         Ping to 107.161.xxx.xxx with 32 bytes of data and 32 of TTL:
11/30 17:20:11.067 PingMin #1 Reply 32 bytes from 107.161.xxx.xxx: time=222ms TTL=51, ave=222.00ms

11/30 17:20:16.072 PingMax #6 Reply 32 bytes from 107.161.xxx.xxx: time=223ms TTL=51, ave=222.17ms

11/30 17:20:21.066 PingMin #11 Reply 32 bytes from 107.161.xxx.xxx: time=221ms TTL=51, ave=222.00ms

11/30 17:20:24.065 PingMax #14 Reply 32 bytes from 107.161.xxx.xxx: time=224ms TTL=51, ave=222.07ms

11/30 17:20:26.069 PingMax #16 Reply 32 bytes from 107.161.xxx.xxx: time=225ms TTL=51, ave=222.25ms

11/30 17:20:28.078 PingMax #18 Reply 32 bytes from 107.161.xxx.xxx: time=229ms TTL=51, ave=222.61ms

11/30 17:20:30.072         === 20 有效发送,   20 接收,     0.00% 丢失, 222.50ms 平均值  ===
--- 结果 & 统计信息 ------------------------------------------------------
开始时间:  2016/11/30 17:20:10
经过时间:            000:00:19
结束时间:  2016/11/30 17:20:30
----------------
    20 总计发送  
    0 无效接收 (除了超时的其它错误)                
----------------
    20 有效发送  
    20 有效接收      
    0 timed out (0.00% 丢失)
Ping 最小值  221ms, 最大值  229ms, 平均值  222.50ms

温馨提示:文章内容系网络信息分享,不代表 主机百科 对观点赞同或支持。

版权声明:本文为原创文章,版权归 主机百科 所有,转载请注明出处!

QQ 交流:VPS、独立服务器、虚拟主机等讨论,加入主机百科官方QQ交流群:332991659

联系站长:主机代购、网站建设等联系QQ:202730019 // Email:admin@zhujiwiki.com

添加新评论